Showing posts with label sp4. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sp4. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

MS SQL Server 7.0 SP4 on Windows 2003 Server.

My regards for all on this NG!

My client need to use Windows 2003 Server, but it have some databases
and systems that use SQLServer 7.0
I need to know if MS SQL Server 7.0 can be instaled and if will run
with no problems into Windows 2003 Server.

Thanks a lot!!

LucioLucio Chiessi [VORio] (lucio@.vorio.eti.br) writes:
> My regards for all on this NG!
> My client need to use Windows 2003 Server, but it have some databases
> and systems that use SQLServer 7.0
> I need to know if MS SQL Server 7.0 can be instaled and if will run
> with no problems into Windows 2003 Server.

Microsoft does not support SQL 7.0 on Windows 2003. See further
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;810391.

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@.sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin.../2000/books.asp|||Thanks a lot for your response.
We are upgrading to MSDE2K and working fine.

Best Regards...|||Lucio Chiessi [VORio] (lucio@.vorio.eti.br) writes:
> Thanks a lot for your response.
> We are upgrading to MSDE2K and working fine.

Be sure to apply SP3, as this is required for Windows 2003.

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@.sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin.../2000/books.asp

Friday, March 23, 2012

MS SQL Server 2k standard - insuffient system resources or memory

Hi,
I have sql 2000 with sp3, on w2k with sp4. It has 3 GB RAM. I haven't set u
p the maximum memory for instance, so they are defaults from 0 to 3072 mb.
My former server worked fine.: It was sql 2000 no sp, on w2k with sp2. It ha
d 1 GB RAM.
I had't set up the maximum memory for instance, so they are defaults from 0
to 1024 mb.
and that worked fine.
My 3rd party programs are finnish accounting programs and they give me very
much error and other conflict messages. I have already checked out everythin
g from setttings and I don't believe it could be any collation problem or so
mething.
I am now wondering what happens when there's no limits of the memory usage.
Will sql use over 2 gb though it can't and give problems after or does it re
alize limits?
Does anyone know?Standard Edition of SQL Server 2000 will not use more than 2G.
It's easy to confirm this with Performance Monitor. What errros are you
getting?
Brian
"Mikko Oksanen" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:70923497-8A0B-43A1-B9FE-608215BC91CA@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I have sql 2000 with sp3, on w2k with sp4. It has 3 GB RAM. I haven't set
up the maximum memory for instance, so they are defaults from 0 to 3072 mb.
> My former server worked fine.: It was sql 2000 no sp, on w2k with sp2. It
had 1 GB RAM.
> I had't set up the maximum memory for instance, so they are defaults from
0 to 1024 mb.
> and that worked fine.
> My 3rd party programs are finnish accounting programs and they give me
very much error and other conflict messages. I have already checked out
everything from setttings and I don't believe it could be any collation
problem or something.
> I am now wondering what happens when there's no limits of the memory
usage. Will sql use over 2 gb though it can't and give problems after or
does it realize limits?
> Does anyone know?
>
>|||Hello,
I looked from the performance monitor. I Noticed it also. Thank you
I get this kind of errors:
Insufficient resources to create UMS scheduler
Run-time error'-2147217900 (80040e14)':
The CREATE DATABASE process is allocating 0,75 MB on disk 'pl3135kk'.
(here the pl3135 is some temp database)
Insufficient system memory to run this query
This kind of problem. Anykind of help could do if you know or have heard thi
s kind of problems
-Mikko-
Standard Edition of SQL Server 2000 will not use more than 2G.
It's easy to confirm this with Performance Monitor. What errros are you
getting?
Brian
"Mikko Oksanen" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:70923497-8A0B-43A1-B9FE-608215BC91CA@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
up the maximum memory for instance, so they are defaults from 0 to 3072 mb.
had 1 GB RAM.
> I had't set up the maximum memory for instance, so they are defaults from
0 to 1024 mb.
> and that worked fine.
very much error and other conflict messages. I have already checked out
everything from setttings and I don't believe it could be any collation
problem or something.
usage. Will sql use over 2 gb though it can't and give problems after or
does it realize limits?sql

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2003 SP1: SP3a or SP4?

Hi,
I want to run MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Would SP3a be
just fine for SQL Server or should I apply SP4, which is not yet tested with
the application, and why?
Are there any differences between installing SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2000
Server SP4 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 and what are they, if any?
--
Many thanks,
OskAt a minimum you need 3a. You might want to consider SP4. Make sure that
you take a look at the following pages so that you have the information that
you need to make your own determination:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp4.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp3.asp
--
Keith
"Oskar" <Oskar@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BD8FF29E-57A3-4A04-9BF0-6698EF153DE3@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I want to run MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Would SP3a be
> just fine for SQL Server or should I apply SP4, which is not yet tested
> with
> the application, and why?
> Are there any differences between installing SQL Server 2000 on Windows
> 2000
> Server SP4 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 and what are they, if any?
> --
> Many thanks,
> Osk
>

MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2003 SP1: SP3a or SP4?

Hi,
I want to run MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Would SP3a be
just fine for SQL Server or should I apply SP4, which is not yet tested with
the application, and why?
Are there any differences between installing SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2000
Server SP4 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 and what are they, if any?
Many thanks,
OskAt a minimum you need 3a. You might want to consider SP4. Make sure that
you take a look at the following pages so that you have the information that
you need to make your own determination:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp4.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp3.asp
Keith
"Oskar" <Oskar@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BD8FF29E-57A3-4A04-9BF0-6698EF153DE3@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I want to run MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Would SP3a be
> just fine for SQL Server or should I apply SP4, which is not yet tested
> with
> the application, and why?
> Are there any differences between installing SQL Server 2000 on Windows
> 2000
> Server SP4 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 and what are they, if any?
> --
> Many thanks,
> Osk
>sql

MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2003 SP1: SP3a or SP4?

Hi,
I want to run MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Would SP3a be
just fine for SQL Server or should I apply SP4, which is not yet tested with
the application, and why?
Are there any differences between installing SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2000
Server SP4 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 and what are they, if any?
Many thanks,
Osk
At a minimum you need 3a. You might want to consider SP4. Make sure that
you take a look at the following pages so that you have the information that
you need to make your own determination:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp4.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/downloads/2000/sp3.asp
Keith
"Oskar" <Oskar@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BD8FF29E-57A3-4A04-9BF0-6698EF153DE3@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I want to run MS SQL Server 2000 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Would SP3a be
> just fine for SQL Server or should I apply SP4, which is not yet tested
> with
> the application, and why?
> Are there any differences between installing SQL Server 2000 on Windows
> 2000
> Server SP4 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 and what are they, if any?
> --
> Many thanks,
> Osk
>